BIP! Finder - A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)

2014 • A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)

Authors: De Winter, J.C.F. (author); Dodou, D. (author)

Venue: PeerJ

Type: Publication

Abstract: It is known that statistically significant (positive) results are more likely to be published than non-significant (negative) results. However, it has been unclear whether any increasing prevalence of positive results is stronger in the “softer” disciplines (social sciences) than in the “harder” disciplines (physical sciences), and whether the prevalence of negative results is decreasing over time. Using Scopus, we searched the abstracts of papers published between 1990 and 2013, and measured longitudinal trends of multiple expressions ... (read more)

Impact:

2.3015374E-8 6.8052204E-9 49 19

/ Attention: 0 16

Topics: Demography Internal medicine

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.447v4

External links: Crossref OpenAIRE

Found 3 versions BibTex PDF

Topic-specific impact indicators

Popularity:
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Influence:
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citation Count:
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Impulse:
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.