2012 •
EVALUATION OF ASTER GDEM v.2 USING GPS CHECKPOINTS, OSGB DEM VALUES AND PHOTOGAMMETRICALLY DERIVED DEMS
Authors: H. Sadeq, J. Drummond, Z. Li
Venue: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Type: Article
Abstract: Abstract. A 2010 study examining ASTER GDEM v1 data revealed accuracies of 12-25m and strong negative discrepancy biases compared to precise GPS observations, in several test sites in China. Rather than further investigating these, with the advent of ASTER GDEM v2 a new series of tests, also using precise GPS observations but also other DEMs, was performed. In these tests better than the expected 17m accuracies were found (RMSE values of 3.9m to 15.3m) and no strong biases.
Popularity: This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the
underlying citation network.
Influence: This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the
underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citation Count: This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in
the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Impulse: This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation
network.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website and the services we offer better. By using this site, you agree to the use of cookies. Learn more