BIP! Finder - Reply to Nicholas et al. Using a ResNet-18 Network to Detect Features of Alzheimer’s Disease on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Failed Replication. Comment on “Odusami et al. Analysis of Features of Alzheimer’s Disease: Detection of Early Stage from Functional Brain Changes in Magnetic Resonance Images Using a Finetuned ResNet18 Network. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1071”

2022 • Reply to Nicholas et al. Using a ResNet-18 Network to Detect Features of Alzheimer’s Disease on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Failed Replication. Comment on “Odusami et al. Analysis of Features of Alzheimer’s Disease: Detection of Early Stage from Functional Brain Changes in Magnetic Resonance Images Using a Finetuned ResNet18 Network. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1071”

Authors: Modupe Odusami; Rytis Maskeliūnas; Robertas Damaševičius; Tomas Krilavičius

Venue: Diagnostics

Type: Publication

Abstract: We have studied the manuscript of Nicholas et al. [...]

Impact:

3.344638E-9 2.8480127E-9 1 1

/ Attention: 0 38

Topics: Neuroscience Nuclear magnetic resonance Psychoanalysis

DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051097

External links: Crossref OpenAIRE

BibTex PDF

Topic-specific impact indicators

Popularity:
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Influence:
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citation Count:
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Impulse:
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.