BIP! Finder - Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam

2018 • Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam

Authors: Joeri K. Tijdink; Brian C. Martinson; Lex M. Bouter; Tamarinde L. Haven

Venue: PLOS ONE

Type: Publication

Abstract: --- For the preregistration of the results this preprint reports on, see here: https://osf.io/x6t2q/register/565fb3678c5e4a66b5582f67 --- Scientists and non-scientist are increasingly concerned about academic research and its lack of valid and reliable results due to research misbehavior. In this light, the role of the research integrity climate has gained increasing attention. In our manuscript, we assess whether researchers from different academic ranks and disciplinary field experience the research integrity climate differently using the Sur... (read more)

Impact:

4.2873275E-8 5.289847E-9 50 23

/ Attention: 0 16

Topics: Medical education

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210599

External links: Crossref OpenAIRE

Found 2 versions BibTex PDF

Topic-specific impact indicators

Popularity:
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Influence:
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citation Count:
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Impulse:
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.