Authors: Bernard Jouffrey, Peter Schattschneider, Cécile Hébert
Venue: Ultramicroscopy
Type: Publication
Abstract: Abstract We resolve the long-standing mysterious discrepancy between the experimental magic angle in EELS— ∼ 2 ϑ E —and the quantum mechanical prediction of ∼ 4 ϑ E . A relativistic approach surpassing the usually applied kinematic correction yields a magic angle close to the experimental value. The reason is that the relativistic correction of the inelastic scattering cross section in anisotropic systems is significantly higher than in isotropic ones.
Popularity: This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the
underlying citation network.
Influence: This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the
underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citation Count: This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in
the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Impulse: This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation
network.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website and the services we offer better. By using this site, you agree to the use of cookies. Learn more