BIP! Finder - Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation

2017 • Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation

Authors: CASNICI, Niccolo'; Grimaldo, Francisco; Gilbert, Nigel; DONDIO, PIERPAOLO; SQUAZZONI, Flaminio

Venue: Scientometrics

Type: Publication

Abstract: This paper investigates the fate of manuscripts that were rejected from JASSS-The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, the flagship journal of social simulation. We tracked 456 manuscripts that were rejected from 1997 to 2011 and traced their subsequent publication as journal articles, conference papers or working papers. We compared the impact factor of the publishing journal and the citations of those manuscripts that were eventually published against the yearly impact factor of JASSS and the number of citations achieved by ... (read more)

Impact:

1.7207777E-8 3.9908303E-9 26 9

/ Attention: 0 43

Topics: Library science

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2241-1

External links: Crossref OpenAIRE

Found 3 versions BibTex PDF

Topic-specific impact indicators

Popularity:
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Influence:
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citation Count:
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Impulse:
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.