@misc{https://doi.org/10.4121/16752223,<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  doi = {10.4121/16752223},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  url = {https://data.4tu.nl/articles/_/16752223},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  author = {Harisena,<br/><span class="tab"></span> Nivedita Varma and Groen,<br/><span class="tab"></span> Thomas and G. Toxopeus,<br/><span class="tab"></span> Albertus and Naimi,<br/><span class="tab"></span> Babak},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  keywords = {Ecology,<br/><span class="tab"></span> FOS: Biological sciences,<br/><span class="tab"></span> Spatial Autocorrelation,<br/><span class="tab"></span> Species distribution modelling,<br/><span class="tab"></span> sdm,<br/><span class="tab"></span> niche models,<br/><span class="tab"></span> r code,<br/><span class="tab"></span> simulated data,<br/><span class="tab"></span> simulated landscapes,<br/><span class="tab"></span> variable importance,<br/><span class="tab"></span> empirical modelling,<br/><span class="tab"></span> spatial data,<br/><span class="tab"></span> raster},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  title = {Supplementary Materials: When is variable importance estimation in species distribution modelling affected by spatial correlation?},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  publisher = {4TU.ResearchData},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  year = {2021},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  copyright = {Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal}
}