@article{https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.6679,<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  doi = {10.17863/CAM.6679},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  url = {https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/261488},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  author = {Chang,<br/><span class="tab"></span> HHY and Watanabe,<br/><span class="tab"></span> G and Gerodimos,<br/><span class="tab"></span> CA and Ochi,<br/><span class="tab"></span> T and Blundell,<br/><span class="tab"></span> TL and Jackson,<br/><span class="tab"></span> SP and Lieber,<br/><span class="tab"></span> MR},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  keywords = {DNA damage,<br/><span class="tab"></span> DNA recombination,<br/><span class="tab"></span> DNA repair,<br/><span class="tab"></span> chromosomes,<br/><span class="tab"></span> double-strand DNA break,<br/><span class="tab"></span> enzyme,<br/><span class="tab"></span> ligase,<br/><span class="tab"></span> nuclease},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  language = {en},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  title = {Different DNA End Configurations Dictate Which NHEJ Components Are Most Important for Joining Efficiency},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  publisher = {American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  year = {2016},<br/><span class="tab"></span>
  copyright = {Attribution 4.0 International}
}