BIP! Finder - Comparison of sampling designs for sediment source fingerprinting in an agricultural watershed in Atlantic Canada

Clear all

2019 • Comparison of sampling designs for sediment source fingerprinting in an agricultural watershed in Atlantic Canada

Authors: Monica Boudreault, Monica Boudreault, Alexander J. Koiter, Alexander J. Koiter, David A. Lobb, Kui Liu, Glenn Benoy, Philip N. Owens, Sheng Li, Sheng Li

Abstract: Sediment fingerprinting is increasingly being used to improve the understanding of sediment dynamics within the critical zone and provide information that can help guide management decisions at the watershed scale. The objectives of this study were to investigate both the implications of different sediment fingerprinting sampling designs and spatial scales on the characterization of sediment dynamics in a predominantly agricultural watershed in northwestern New Brunswick, Canada. Color and radionuclide fingerprints were used to discriminate bet (...) Sediment fingerprinting is increasingly being used to improve the understanding of sediment dynamics within the critical zone and provide information that can help guide management decisions at the watershed scale. The objectives of this study were to investigate both the implications of different sediment fingerprinting sampling designs and spatial scales on the characterization of sediment dynamics in a predominantly agricultural watershed in northwestern New Brunswick, Canada. Color and radionuclide fingerprints were used to discriminate between three potential sediment sources: agricultural topsoil, agricultural streambanks, and forested areas (topsoil and streambanks). Suspended sediment was collected seasonally, between 2008 and 2014, at five sites with drainage areas ranging from 3.0 to 13.4 km2. Using the same source and sediment data set, multiple-, nested-, and local-location fingerprinting sampling designs were employed to investigate the influence of scale of observation, geomorphic connectivity, land use, and the heterogeneity of source fingerprints on apportionment results. Sediment collected in the headwaters was primarily derived from forested areas while the sediment collected at the outlet of the watershed was primarily from agricultural topsoil. When comparing the multiple- and nested-location designs, it was found that accounting for the spatial variability in the fingerprint properties of each source had a small difference in the sediment apportionment results. Furthermore, the local-location design demonstrated that the sediment collected at each location was composed of predominately local sources as opposed to upstream sediment entering the local catchment. Assessment of the sources of sediment at a range of spatial scales better accounts for both geomorphic connectivity and differences in land use throughout the watershed. Overall, each of the three fingerprinting sampling designs provided different information that can be used to guide soil and water conservation management. (Read More)

External links: OpenAIRE

Works in BIP! associated with the specified OpenAIRE research product

Comparison of sampling designs for sediment source fingerprinting in an agricultural water (...)

Monica Boudreault, Alexander J. Koiter, David A. Lobb, Kui Liu, Glenn Benoy, Philip N. Owens, Sheng (...)

Journal of Soils and Sediments · 2019

N/A

Restricted/Closed Access

Article